Position Papers
April 6, 2018, michaelbray Character - or not, Good Riddance, Position Papers,
5 April, 2018 Just watched again that 20-year-old movie about the Clintons with Travolta and Emma Thompson making Bill and Hillary look good. Primary Colors (1998) turned out to be a pro-Clinton propaganda piece even while exploiting the interesting decadence of that couple. It is the way of Hollywood to honor the decadent “personalities” of our time […]
March 27, 2018, michaelbray Apologetics, Family Matters, Political Ministry of the Churches of God, Position Papers, Wilmington News Journal,
27 March, 2018 Anno Domini You only live once (on this planet)! – as far as we know – so why not live the way you choose? Why deny someone his choice for opioids? Why campaign against this sacred right? Sounds stupid, but it is not irrational. I don’t understand how a secular society thinks […]
December 14, 2017, michaelbray Polytheistic Statism v. Christocracy, Position Papers,
14 December, 2017 As we move into the Advent season in the Year of Our Lord 2017, I am distracted, once again, by sundry insolent messages: Kwanzaa! Hanukkah! (Or some other squawking counter-Christmas disturbances.) I react with such apparent impertinence to what may seem to be innocuous, wholesome, human, cultural events. But why? I must […]
October 26, 2017, michaelbray Abortionists and Terminations, Apologetics, Character - or not, Polytheistic Statism v. Christocracy, Position Papers, Sanctity of Human Beings, Terrorism - of God and Men, Wars, Just and Unjust,
The brief attached at the link below, written by Michael Hirsh in 1995, was published by the Regent University Law Review. It provides the legal argument for the termination of an abortionist by one who is acting in defense of the innocents who are threatened by the actions of said abortionist. Hirsh brief
June 28, 2017, michaelbray Civil Disobedience, Political Ministry of the Churches of God, Polytheistic Statism v. Christocracy, Position Papers,
. . . of Baby Murder 2 June, 2017 How does a legitimate government tolerate the murder of innocents? How does a legitimate government take tax money and pay for the murder of innocent without resistance from the citizens? Why do you continue to honor and support such authority? These are the questions that need […]
October 21, 2016, michaelbray Elections, Political Ministry of the Churches of God, Position Papers,
21 October, 2016 “Love, love, love” crooned those Beatles back in the 60s. And so it is, in the “Land of the Free” lovers. It is all about “love,” especially sex. We tolerate it pouring into our homes through a little box that we turn on. We see all kinds of “love.” And then we […]
January 5, 2015, michaelbray Position Papers, Uncategorized,
CoverBrochure p1ETS1993 p2ETS1993 p3ETS1993 p4ETS1993 p5ETS1993 p6ETS1993 p7ETS1993 p8ETS1993 p9ETS1993 p10ETS1993 p11ETS1993 p12ETS1993 The above was submitted to the Evangelical Theological Society in 1993. I also submitted an essay in 1990, “The Ethics of Operation Rescue” and read it at one of the elective “break out meetings” the annual meeting, held that year in New Orleans. […]
September 1, 2011, michaelbray Position Papers,
Reformation Lutheran Church Anno Domini 2001 Position Statement: Women in the Military Statement The recent trend in our society to put women in combat roles in the name of equal rights is more of the same buffoonery that brought us child slaughter under the same principle. There is no benefit for the national defense in […]
September 1, 2011, michaelbray Position Papers,
Reformation Lutheran Church Anno Domini 2001 Position Statement: The Tenth Amendment Statement Article Ten of the Amendments to the Constitution of the United States very succinctly says: “The powers not delegated to the United States by the Constitution, nor prohibited by it to the States, are reserved to the States respectively, or to the people.” […]
September 1, 2011, michaelbray Position Papers,
Reformation Lutheran Church Anno Domini 2001 States’ Right to Execute Abortionists Statement: Whereas: The ongoing slaughter of innocent womb children by both surgical and chemical means is the product of an opinion written by an ephemeral judicial tribunal; opinions of the Supreme Court are not law and ought not be respected as edicts from a […]