There is Not Enough Hate in the World
21 October, 2016
“Love, love, love” crooned those Beatles back in the 60s. And so it is, in the “Land of the Free” lovers. It is all about “love,” especially sex. We tolerate it pouring into our homes through a little box that we turn on. We see all kinds of “love.” And then we turn Puritan and take offense when our would-be President and champion against an entrenched wicked opponent is accused of being naughty and saying bad things to or about women. (Horrors!) Do we not hate evil?
Lest we get carried away with the love fest of our times where we are exhorted by philanthropist and “theologian” alike to indiscriminately “love” everyone to the point that we tolerate sodomy and buggery (yea even exalt the same unto the high holy standing of matrimony!) let us attend to some needed clarification. Impudent calls for such perversion in the name of “love” and “tolerance” ought to be roundly scorned and condemned. The basic principle of the West which underlies all others is the imago Dei in the people of all nations. The promoting of decadence is a treason against the high principle. It is a disgracing of that image.
Yes, that which was tolerated by the masses (granted, it was imposed by “justices”) has been, apparently, embraced by the people. Maybe that is why it is said of some folks, “their shit don’t stink.” We get accustomed to evil after tolerating it a while. It doesn’t horrify as it once did. Perhaps a refresher on long old basics would be helpful.
It is that very “image” in man which provides the basis for human dignity and the sanctify of life in each person, including those of any color or womb. And our true love for the dignity in humanity endowed by God induces us to declare with the Holy Writ writer: “Oh how I love Your law . . . my meditation,” and “I hate every false way” and “I hate those that are double-minded” (Ps. 119: 97-113).
We ought properly to maintain the same response to sinners and evildoers that God does. He is just and punishes while he is also full of mercy. He does not excuse the unrepentant. And he does not continue forever to tolerate a nation which practices the shedding of innocent blood to the point that the people maintain, year after year into the fifth decade, the practice of child-slaughter.
Such toleration is sin. Such toleration bespeaks insufficient hatred for evil. There is not enough intolerance. We are weak, indifferent and wicked. We are perverted. And His indulgence of such a people will come to an end.
To put the matter in perspective. Candidate Trump is regarded as too offensive for morally discerning voters for uttering foul words and for “allegedly” cavorting with women in an ungentlemanly fashion – or for committing some similar anacoluthically stated misdemeanor. Candidate Clinton, on the other hand, is on record not only for committing crimes in office which have seriously threatened the security of the whole nation but for candidly and vigorously advocating for the butchering of little children in the womb. Yes, even the real big ones of the 2nd and 3rd trimester, indeed any child whom the mother deems unwanted.
Yes, Trump was correct. There are those killed right up to the end. And the total since 1973 up to the Year of Our Lord 2016 is 60 million (60,000,000). Ought to be enough to give a little weight to that one issue over and above the issue of rudeness to woman! Such a nasty, nasty fellow!
“Are you kidding me?” some of my kids might say.
Wholesale child-slaughter is about to be advanced yet further by this demonaic and yet the one – Anyone! Trump will certainly do! – who could be put in her place is rejected because he is . . . not nice!
(Idiots!) And this even when the “insufferably crude” Trump pledges to install judges who will overturn Roe!
(I would rather he declare an emergency against “enemies domestic,” just call out the national guard, and close them all down; he might well have the balls [“hubris,” if you insist] unlike any of the more stately, refined, and smooth politicians.)
There is a priority problem, a brain problem, a discernment impairment, which, I suppose, “goes with the territory” of a nation of citizens guilty of the shedding innocent blood and scourged with a warped preoccupation with the manners!