Why Americans Deserve to Lose the “Right” to Self-Protection
March, 2013
Catherine Ramey, M. Div.
In the 1960s and 70s Americans worshipped at the altar of “Free Speech,” no matter how abominable.
They praised high court decisions allowing anti-Semites and anti-Blacks to spew hatred in public and applauded large public marches with anonymous men garbed in long white robes and coned hoods with cloth cut out for their eyes. Some even rallied around those who burned crosses onto lawns.
Others argued for the “right” of women to have their Unborn babies killed for all kinds of reasons; “rape,” “incest,” “life-of-the-mother,” And for no reason at all. Those who hated the so-called “burden” of children argued on behalf of “Free Speech” for “the Klan,” all the while planning to use those ugly masked men and the Supreme Court decisions supporting them as a means to spread a form of hatred all their own.
They redefined reality; said Unborn children were merely “products of conception”–spitting it out like an obscenity with other words like “fetus,” “tissue” and “medical waste.” They chose to ignore that we all start life at conception; that is what it means to be human. They were cowards, as were their predecessors. Their vision of “health” was no different than Adolph Hitler’s. “Survival of the fittest,” both pre and post WWII include those deemed most intellectual, most monied, most powerful, most white and a useful cadre of others approved for survival to serve their Elitist interests.
Like Hitler, “feminist wags” (Margaret Sanger, Ruth Barnett, Mary Dennett, Eleanor Roosevelt, etc.) crusaded during the first four decades of the 20th century for Anglo-superiority, and so Adolf was confident the world was with him in getting rid of one subset of “useless” humanity and “vermin” (as his German State labeled the redefined Jews).
By the last days of WWII Adolph was in despair. The world that he presumed would applaud his efforts at exterminating Jews and political “undesirables” had turned its back on the very sort of population control through sterilization and eugenics all the scholars from industrialized nations had been promoting when he came to power. In despair he shot himself before the Americans and Russians got a chance. They would have used him alive just as they did after he became a corpse; suggesting he was an aberration, a singular evil, so alien no other national leader or regime could ever be compared. Americans, Italians, French and Russians would self-righteously deny their own complicity in the deaths of 14-million inmates of the Nazi Death Camps; victims like:
64-year-old Isaac Angel
19-year-old Eti Axselrad
38-year-old Szmel Oskola
75-year-old Helena Veit
The seven Adler children ranging in age from 4 to 17-years of age
39-year-old Deitrich Bonhoeffer and his brother Klaus and two brothers-in law, Hans von Dohnanyi and Rudiger Schleicher.
18-year-old Schmul Fudiman.
2-year-old twin girls Anshel and Beila Altman, along with their siblings who were 5, 10, 11, 13, 14 and 16-years of age.
And 14-million others.
A holocaust is no deterrent to Zealots like Madison Grant, author of the 1921 “Bestseller” in America, The Passing of the Great Race, a book of “modern science” extolling “racial hygiene” to rid societies of those deemed “unfit” by virtue of their non-Aryan progenitors. Grant swarmed with the Rockefellers, Carnagies, Margaret Sanger, Harry H. Laughlin and Secretary of the U.N. Dag Hammarskjold, as well as thousands of other Elitists fighting to save culture from Blacks and other racial groups naively considered to be genetically inferior and the cause of criminality, poverty and wars.
These individuals and their “foundations” (Yes, the same ones that fund Public Broadcasting) set the stage for Eugenics on a grand scale, far more dramatic and deceptive than Hitler’s murder of 14-million in death camps.
The Elitist call for “racial purity” to advance the wealth of societies would eventually take a death grip on the Disabled as well as the Unborn of any race. (Better to lose a few Aryan children than to openly advocate their real agenda to eliminate all Black children.) Over 60,000 individuals in America were forcibly sterilized because they were deemed disabled or part of “disadvantaged groups” living on the margins of society. Dr. Lutz Kaelber writes,
“American eugenic laws and practices implemented in the first decades of the twentieth century influenced the much larger National Socialist compulsory sterilization program, which between 1934 and 1945 led to approximately 350,000 compulsory sterilizations and was a stepping stone to the Holocaust.” (http://www.uvm.edu/~lkaelber/eugenics/)
And of course now we are seeing a push for mandated death of those deemed worthless by virtue of mental or physical incapacity, and of particular concern are the older generation (I have an entire file of recent cases, “scholarly papers” and commentaries).
Those entering retirement are among the most vulnerable as the Progressive Movement started by these Eugenicists, Communists and Elitists sees little value in lives that no longer labor to uphold the State and its definition of “health.” (See http://www.ssa.gov/policy/docs/ssb/v66n4/v66n4p37.html for one analysis that also includes information suggesting why the government no longer enforces immigration laws.)
This is a global issue for industrialized nations (see http://www.nia.nih.gov/sites/default/files/WPAM.pdf ) and will only become a crisis of larger proportions to the Progressive-Mind which cannot fathom transcendent aid from a Great Creator.
The Internet is a hodge-podge of views on every imaginable subject, but the “scholarly” articles demonstrating the Progressive worldview are easily identified, and they are in a fever over the growth of what they perceive to be a dependent population with little to do but eat up resources they consider better-spent elsewhere. It matters little that resources like Social Security have only existed because taxpayers have been tapped all their working lives to contribute to a Trust Fund that was set up to provide some safety net for the worker’s possible disability or old age. (But that too was a government ruse since the average age of death at that time was 63, and so Social Security eligibility was conveniently set at 65.)
So having looked at a little, tiny (very tiny) slice of history and seeing the manner in which Americans have allowed the nation to transition from one established to uphold the dignity of all persons, to a nation that defines “dignity” for portions of the population as an obligation to die and disappear . . . (I speak of the Unborn slaughtered by abortionists, as well as the Disabled like Nancy Cruzan and Terry Schiavo, killed by their respective “care providers”. . . millions and millions of people) . . . I can only conclude that the hue and cry over “gun control” is too little, too late.
Such panic as we witness today as the New Police State attempts to disarm all American citizens should have been sounded in the 1960s when Eugenicists dressed as “feminists” began to lobby for the “right” to murder their own offspring.
Such loud protest should have included the bearing of arms in the late 60s and early 70s to stop the opening of any hospital or facility willing to commit the insuperably evil crime of abortion against an unborn child.
It should have resulted in an army of well-equipped Winchester, Remington, Barretta, Colt . . . (among other weapons) owners making it a point that not only abortionists were risking getting caught up in a battle to protect the Unborn, but so too would their accomplices all along the Abortion-Murder-Conveyor-Belt be at grave risk as good men and women sought to protect innocent babies.
In 1993 the first man with testicles defended the Unborn by bringing down an abortionist who was on course for killing–MURDERING– a dozen Unborn infants in his “clinic” in Pensacola, Florida that day. That too would have been an appropriate time to loudly, boldly, courageously affirm the right to Self-Defense and Defense of the Innocent; the right to own and use guns to assure justice for all.
But instead gun-owners were silent; Second-Amendment freedoms were negotiated away under the idea the government would limit its intrusion into our lives as long as men were silent in the face of over a million dead babies every year since 1973.
Well, America, how’s that working for you?
You see, we do “reap what we sow”; those who thought it unfit to rescue over 60-million Unborn infants from those bent on their slaughter now stand to lose a “right” to keep the guns they used for sport and never thought to bring out to rescue even ONE of those unborn victims. After practicing cowardice and selective justice for over 40 and 50 years, do you really think God cares about the government taking away your guns?! Really?
Summary of PP v. ACLA The Kermit Gosnell of Pennsylvania Avenue
Comments are currently closed.