24 Jan., 2018<\/p>\n
What will the Supremes say?\u00a0 Will they treat the bakers like they treated baby advocates?<\/p>\n
They are to hear the plea of those Christian bakers in\u00a0 Oregon.\u00a0 SCOTUS is weak in its opinions because it has forsaken (divine) Justice.\u00a0 Having rejected the Law as the guide for what is right and just – the guide for understanding\u00a0 our own\u00a0 national values of “life, liberty, and justice for all – the judges cannot even rule justly to protect human life at its beginning!\u00a0 How can they do justice for life as it progresses through the many turns of its course?\u00a0 How can they give the bakers a break?\u00a0 They must give way to the “feelings” of those poor sodomites who were denied a fag wedding cake which they demanded that Christians create for them!<\/p>\n
Oh the “feelings” of the heathen!\u00a0 How oppressed they feel<\/strong> when Christians speak the Truth to them! Poor things. \u00a0It is so hurtful to their sensitive, Godless, souls!<\/p>\n Are they<\/strong> sensitive<\/em> to those who love the Law and advocate it for all?<\/p>\n Similarly, we “anti-aborts” are still “under the gun” from the oppression of FACE. \u00a0The so-called Freedom of Access the Clinic Entrance law 1994) was designed as a political weapon to restrict protests against baby killing (a.k.a. “abortion” or, to use the euphemistic propaganda of the pro-abortion folks,\u00a0 – “a woman’s right to control her body”!\u00a0 Really!).<\/p>\n Will they shut the bakers down like they shut down Andrew Burnett’s Life Advocate Magazine<\/em>, the ACLA \u00a0and other voices for the protection of the womb children?<\/p>\n The Patriot Post<\/em> says:<\/p>\n The Oregon Court of Appeals upheld a decision that forced two Christian bakers to pay $135,000 to a lesbian couple who said they felt \u201cmentally raped\u201d when the bakers declined to make a wedding cake. https:\/\/patriotpost.us\/opinion\/53191-oregon-court-rules-christian-bakery-must-pay-$135k-to-lesbian-couple<\/a><\/p>\n They shut us down proclaiming that we were threatening violence (to violent<\/em> baby killers, indeed).\u00a0 (What is wrong with that? \u00a0You don’t scare a wolf from its prey by being nice to him!)\u00a0 But, in fact, we actually made no threats.\u00a0 They “felt” threatened and so we were found guilty, guilty as charged by their “feelings.”<\/p>\n